(818) 952-2168

Click for more information:

Trial Victories
Wible v. Aetna
Willick v. Continental Casualty
Long Beach v. ISOP
Mixon v. Met Life
Malek v. Met Life
Hilton v. Liberty Life
Shalom v. Met Life
Dent v. Canada Life
ExxonMobil v. PTS
Whalen v. Standard Insurance
West v. Met Life

Appeal Victories
Opeta v. Northewest Airlines Pension Plan
Green v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Davis v. First Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Kolano v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Baboudjian v. Continental Casualty Company
City of Long Beach v. Insurance Company St. of Penn.

Its not just individuals that get treated badly by insurance companies. In this case the insurers had no problem denying the claim of one of California's largest cities.
I was (still am) representing the City of Long Beach. The City lost a multi-million dollar judgment in a housing discrimination lawsuit. The City turned to its excess coverage insurers for them to pay their share of the judgment. But the insurers denied coverage.
The insurers claimed that the discrimination had been intentional, and that under California law they had no obligation to provide coverage for intentional conduct. The problem for the insurers was that the City was named as a separate insured under the policies, and had to be evaluated separately for coverage. So, while the City's employees might have been guilty of intentional conduct, there wasn't any evidence at all that the City itself had done anything wrong.

In fact, as attorney Ricardo Echeveria and I showed at trial, the City didn't discriminate against anyone, but was only trying, in good faith, to enforce dangerous violations of its building codes.

Anyway, at the conclusion of the trial, the Court issued a judgment of almost 2 million dollars in the City's favor.